Archive for the 'Ron Paul' Category

Blogging Live from Rivermont Presbyterian Church, Polling Location for Stuart Heights 1 & 2 (Precincts) - UPDATED

Despite that long title, there’s nothing much exciting to say. This is my first time ever doing campaigning on an election day. Of course, then again, this is the first election where I’ve donated to a political campaign, put a bumper sticker on my car, or been involved in the campaign at all … although I might have put a Badnarik ‘04 sticker on my car had I had access to one. I just wasn’t involved enough at that time to seek one out, nor did I have enough income to spare to donate to a campaign.

I’ve been our here since a little before 10 a.m. this morning. When I got here, another guy from my precinct was already here with a banner and some signs. He left about 12:30 or so, and I’ve been out here alone ever since.

I’m a bit surprised that none of the other campaigns are represented out here today. There aren’t even many signs out. I count five Ron Paul signs (not counting the one I’m holding), two Hillary Clinton signs, and one Mike Huckabee sign … and that one only appeared while I was at Subway grabbing lunch around 2pm. I expected there to be at least a Huckabee supporter, and maybe an Obama supporter out.

The response has been lackluster to say the least. I’ve had a few people blow there horns and wave and/or give me a thumbs up. A few people gave me a thumbs down, and one curmudgeon rolled down his window and yelled “f___ you!”

I had expected there to be an influx of people around lunch time, but didn’t really observe much of an increase. Perhaps more people will start showing up around 5pm or so … if the rain holds off long enough for me to last that long.

Update: 4:06 p.m. - Traffic is starting to pick up now. I’ve had a couple more people drop by and give me the thumbs up gesture. One guy pulled in and asked when the polls closed, and said he and his wife would be back to vote for Ron Paul. I also was able to direct a non-RP voter to his proper polling location.

Update: 6:41 p.m. - Seeing lots of folks coming out now. People are telling me the wait inside is 15 minutes or so right now. I’ve seen a number of Ron Paul supporters, but I’ve also talked to a few folks who support other candidates. I know I’ve made my fair share of digs at Rudy Giuliani, but I talked to one fellow who had been a supporter who was glad to see I was out working at the polls, and was glad to see so many people voting. A few hours ago, I talked to a doctor who told me he’d voted for Obama, but really liked Ron Paul, because after all, they were both doctors. He really liked Ron Paul’s stance on immigration, though he disagreed with him on other issues. Another fellow told me that there are far more people out voting tonight than were here at the last presidential election.

It’s been a long day, but I’m glad I took the time to come out. This has been one of the most rewarding things I’ve done in a long time. Even if the majority of the people in my district don’t vote for Dr. Paul, it’s exciting to see how many of them care about the direction of the country that they do get out and vote.

Update: 8:24 p.m. - The crowd started to die down not too long after my last update. By 7:15 or so, the place was pretty much dead. By 8:00, I was ready to go home.

I’m sore and I’ve got blisters on my feet, and I’m dead tired. But … it was fun. I’m glad I was able to take the time to do this today, even though I wish I had been able to give more time to efforts prior to today. Now to sit back and relax … well, maybe not. I do have to catch up on some of the work I missed today.

Overall, I’m really, really surprised to have not seen supporters of any other candidate out. Several people who arrived to vote said the same thing. I’m pleased that the Ron Paul campaign was the only campaign to be represented at all at my polling place … and except for a few breaks to grab food and run home, he was represented all day! Woohoo!

Chuck Baldwin on Ron Paul & Israel

Thanks to NetNewsWire/NewsGator, I just got finished reading an excellent article about Ron Paul and our nation and its policy towards Israel (”Ron Paul’s Israel Problem“). He points out, quite rightly, that the major stumbling blocks for most Conservative Christians in regards to Ron Paul’s positions are his opposition to the continued occupation of Iraq and his opposition to continued aid for Israel. Baldwin then goes on to argue quite coherently that:

  1. If Israel is God’s chosen nation and/or the Jews are His chosen people, then he can jolly well take care of them without our help,
  2. No matter what you think of Israel and the Jews and how they relate to the doctrine of eschatology (the end times), our “aid” to Israel is hardly that, and
  3. Despite all of our “aid” to Israel, they’ve not always behaved in ways that could be classified as “friendly” towards the United States, so
  4. We’d be well served in thinking seriously about our policy in the Middle East, especially in regards to Israel … and that Ron Paul is really on the right track here.

Let’s start with this:

Unfortunately, many (if not most) of today’s evangelical Christians have bought into the whole neocon warmongering mentality. Somewhere along the way, evangelicals have forgotten the historic Christian understanding of “just war,” not to mention our Savior’s promise of divine blessing upon peacemakers. They have allowed President George W. Bush and his fellow warmongers to hijack the legitimate use of defensive war and turn it into a commitment to aggressive and preemptive war.

If the United States continues on its current path of aggressive, preemptive war, incessant nation-building, empire-building, and globalism, our country will collapse. If history teaches us anything, it teaches us that no super-power can long survive global warfare. The economic, moral, and spiritual strain on the nation would be more than it could long endure. In other words, Bush’s war doctrine has put America on a crash course with disaster, and evangelicals are downright foolish to go along with it.

I can’t improve on that, so let’s move along.

So, what’s this about our aid actually being harmful to Israel? Well, try this:

My dear Christian brethren, let’s get real: America’s policies toward Israel have not been a blessing to her. They have been a curse … For example, America continues to furnish Israel’s enemies with three times more aid and assistance than it does Israel. Three times. Is that being a blessing to Israel? America gives unflinching and magnanimous support to militant Muslim governments such as Saudi Arabia. There is no nation in the Middle East that has harbored, trained, supplied, and supported more terrorists than Saudi Arabia. Is that being a blessing to Israel? In addition, every time an American President wants to meddle in Middle Eastern affairs, he insists that Israel give up land for peace. President Bush is doing that very thing anew and afresh at this very moment. Is that being a blessing to Israel?

Let me assure the reader (if he or she needs assurance) that Israel knows how to defend itself. In fact, Israel has over 300 nuclear weapons. Israel has enough weaponry and nuclear capability to take out any threat to its sovereignty that any Arab nation–or group of Arab nations–could mount against it.

If Iraq was a legitimate threat, Israel could have taken out Baghdad, Saddam Hussein, and his entire army with little difficulty. The same is true right now with Iran. If Iran is a legitimate threat, Israel could launch whatever attack is necessary to defend itself. It should not need Washington’s permission. Israel is a sovereign nation. It should have the right to defend itself as it deems necessary. Frankly, it is none of Washington’s business. The truth is, Israel’s perennial precariousness is a direct result of Washington’s constant interference.

Now … on to his allegations that Israel hasn’t always acted as our friend:

Furthermore, Christians need to understand that Jewish interests are not always harmonious with the interests of Christianity or the interests of the United States. Israel certainly did not act in a friendly fashion when it attacked the Navy intelligence ship, the USS Liberty, in 1967. That attack was the second deadliest against a U.S. vessel since the end of World War II. The attack also marked the single greatest loss of life by the U.S. intelligence community. 34 U.S. servicemen were killed and 173 were wounded in that attack. In addition, Israel is often found to be engaged in espionage within the United States. Should America turn a blind eye to such activities? Of course not.

I’ll be perfectly honest with you, I had absolutely no idea what he was talking about. We sure didn’t cover this in history class in school (no surprise, since the ‘official’ history taught in public schools often bears about as much resemblance to the real deal as I do to Greta Garbo). I checked out the Wikipedia article on the USS Liberty incident, and here’s what I found:

The USS Liberty, an intelligence-gathering ship, was poking around the Sinai peninsula during the Six-Day War in 1967 (I know, you’re shocked that we would even be hanging out over there), and was attacked by Israeli fighters and torpedo boats. The official Israeli and American position is that the attack was an accident, and that Israeli forces mistook the ship for an Egyptian vessel (that was only half the size of the Liberty). But …

These conclusions have been challenged from several fronts, most notably by an organization of Liberty survivors, as well as by some key former high-ranking officials who were in office at the time in the United States government, including the Secretary of State, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Director of the NSA, and the senior legal counsel to the U.S. Navy Court of Inquiry into the incident.

Baldwin obviously believes that Israel deliberately targeted the Liberty. After reading the article, I’m not convinced. I lean towards the attack being accidental, but I’m definitely not 100% convinced.

Regardless of whether Baldwin’s allegations concerning Israel’s attitude toward the United States are true or not, his other points still stand. Israel is hardly helpless. During the Six-Day War, they cleaned the clocks of Egypt, Jordan, and Syria (who were being aided by Iraq, Algeria, Saudi Arabia, and Kuwait). Does that sound helpless to you? Is a nation that has 300 nuclear weapons … enough to probably wipe every other Middle Eastern and North African nation off the map … helpless? Israel does not need our help.

Baldwin is right. It’s time for Evangelical Christians to consider the wisdom of Ron Paul’s position on American aid to Israel.

Glenn Beck Validates Ron Paul’s Income Tax Claim

Earlier today Ron Paul was on the Glenn Beck TV show via telephone. I was just reading through a transcript of the show, and this part caught my attention:

GLENN: When you were on my program on television, you said something that I didn’t correct because I didn’t — I mean, it sounded so outlandish but I let it go because I didn’t have the facts and you sounded so convinced of it that I thought, hmmm, I’ve got to check into that and I’ll correct it the next time he’s on or I’ll correct it the next day. What you said was, if we got rid of the income tax, the Government would still take about the same amount of money in as they had ten years ago.

PAUL: Approximately.

GLENN: We looked into it and it’s accurate. Can you explain that and how do we get that message out to people?

I’ve heard people ask Paul time and again in interviews how the Federal government would operate if we completely eliminated the income tax, and he’s always responded that if we did, we’d be taking in the same amount of money we were ten years ago … and without fail the person(s) interviewing him laugh as if the idea is absolutely preposterous.

Here we have Glenn Beck, who was (at first) not a Paul supporter … saying he thought the idea was “outlandish”, and that he checked into it and Paul is correct.

And then there is this gem:

GLENN: I mean, you know, we just — I just happen to disagree with you, but I respect you, sir, for your opinion. I have said this, you know, behind your back. So let me say it to your face. I think you are the closest we have running to a founding father. You seem to be the only guy who has actually read the federalist papers. So I appreciate your efforts, sir.

I think Glenn is starting to like Ron.

Addendum: You can find the transcript of the entire interview here: Ron’s Revolution

Local Ron Paul Supporters Open Ron Paul HQ in Cleveland, TN

Local grassroots supporters of Ron Paul’s presidential campaign announced today that they will be opening a local campaign headquarters in Cleveland, TN at 3525 Keith St., Suite I this Friday, January 25 at 5:30 p.m. Dr. Daniel Hoffman, Assistant Professor of History at Lee University will be speaking briefly at the event. The public is invited to attend.

The campaign headquarters is a joint project sponsored by the Ron Paul Meetup Groups in Chattanooga and Chattanooga, TN. The Chattanooga group was founded in May of 2007 and claims over 275 members. The Cleveland group was founded in September of 2007 and has 50 members.

The libertarian-leaning Dr. Ron Paul is the only anti-war Republican candidate contending for the presidential nomination, has broken two fundraising records in the past few months, reportedly has more money in the bank at this time than any other Republican candidate, and is still raising money at a time when other campaigns are short on cash.

Ron Paul has served Texas’ 14th congressional district in the U.S. House of Representatives since 1997. Dr. Paul works tirelessly for limited constitutional government, low taxes, free markets, and a return to sound monetary policies. He voted against the Iraq War and Patriot Act, and never votes for legislation unless the proposed measure is expressly authorized by the Constitution. He presently serves on the House Committee on Financial Services and the House Committee on Foreign Affairs. He continues to advocate a dramatic reduction in the size of the federal government and a return to constitutional principles. As a specialist in obstetrics/gynecology, Dr. Paul has delivered more than 4,000 babies. He and his wife Carol, who reside in Lake Jackson, Texas, are the proud parents of five children and have 17 grandchildren.

For more information about Ron Paul, visit www.ronpaul2008.com.
For more information about the Chattanooga, TN Ron Paul Meetup Group, visit ronpaul.meetup.com/386.
For more information about the Cleveland, TN Ron Paul Meetup Group, visit ronpaul.meetup.com/888.

Constitution Party of Oregon Endorses Ron Paul

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
JANUARY 21, 2008
CONTACT: DAVID BROWNLOW, VICE CHAIRMAN, 503-307-3851

CONSTITUTION PARTY OF OREGON

RON PAUL SHOULD BE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

Eugene, OR - On January 19, 2007, the Central and Executive Committee of the CONSTITUTION PARTY OF OREGON met and voted to offer our wholehearted endorsement of Congressman Ron Paul for President.

Chairman Jack Alan Brown, Jr. said, “This may seem as an unusual step for the CONSTITUTION PARTY OF OREGON, to endorse a Republican, but our reason is clear – Congressman Paul is the best choice among any of the candidates currently seeking the nomination from the “two” big parties.”

Congressman Paul stands out among the professional politicians of our day:

He has never voted for a tax increase during his ten terms in Congress.
He supports the elimination of any program or bureaucracy that is not specifically authorized by our Constitution.
He would bring our soldiers home, not just from Iraq, but also from the 130 other countries where we have left them to languish.
He advocates a return to sound, constitutional gold and silver money.
He would work to restore the proper balance of power between the states and the federal government.
He would work to abolish the IRS.
He would defend the sovereignty of the United States, while avoiding “nation building” misadventures.
He would initiate legislation that recognizes the legal personhood of the unborn child.

Congressman Ron Paul’s positions are very timely, considering America’s present economic and foreign policy challenges. We urge our fellow Oregonians to inform themselves regarding the message being put forth by his campaign.

David Brownlow, Vice Chairman, said, “It is notable that Ron Paul’s record during his 20 years in Congress is one of dedicated adherence to the oath he swore to defend the constitution, and is entirely consistent with his message today. Maybe change is not always such a good thing.”

The CONSTITUTION PARTY OF OREGON offers Congressman Ron Paul our enthusiastic support.

#

CONSTITUTION PARTY OF OREGON
560-A NE ‘F’ Street, Box 201, Grants Pass OR 97526
541-659-4313, 503-307-3851; www.constitutionpartyoregon.net

Hat Tip: Third Party Watch

FOX News: Notice Something Missing?

So, Ron Paul has come in a (distant) second place in Nevada caucuses. I was watching the results from the moment they started reporting them this afternoon. After the first 30 minutes or so, Ron Paul passed McCain to take second place, and kept building his lead through the rest of the day. Even then, at the very beginning, Ron Paul was only a few votes behind McCain.

Keep that in mind as you look at the following screen capture of FOX’s coverage today (which notes that <1% of the precincts were reporting):

omit-fox.jpg

Hmmm. Have we maybe left somebody out? I know obviously Romney was leading from the beginning and his lead increased throughout the day (and he did have an impressive showing), but come on …

Hat Tip: Third Party Watch (”We Omit; You Decide“)

Addendum: I will say in FOX’s defense (as much as it pains me to type that phrase) that it is entirely possible that they were discussing the performance of the three frontrunners in the GOP race, and those three are undeniably Romney, McCain, and Huckabee. That would be one potential explanation for why those three are listed in the “main” part of the graphic while the bottom does show Paul and his showing thus far. That being said, this is the network that has been known for ignoring and slighting Paul throughout the campaign.

Ron Paul on His Electability

Ron Paul is asked during the FOX debates on Tuesday night about his electability … and boy, what an answer we get …

Ron Paul Supporters Donate Nearly $20 Million in Fourth Quarter

This just in from the Ron Paul campaign HQ:

Ron Paul Supporters Donate Nearly $20 Million in Fourth Quarter

Message of freedom, peace and prosperity rallies record support

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
CONTACT: Jesse Benton

January 1, 2008
703-248-9115

ARLINGTON, VIRGINIA –Texas Congressman Ron Paul’s presidential campaign had a record fundraising quarter, exceeding its original goal of $12 million by over 50 percent when it raised nearly $20 million during the months of October, November and December.

“Only Dr. Paul has the ability to inspire Americans to contribute and take action that is necessary if Republicans want to defeat the Democrats in November,” said campaign chairman Kent Snyder.

In two 24-hour periods on November 5 and December 16, the campaign raised over $10 million dollars. The total of over $19.5 million represents an increase of nearly 300 percent from its third quarter total of $5.28 million.

For the quarter, the campaign had over 130,000 donors, including over 107,000 new donors. The total was reached with an average donation size that was just under $90.

Of the other Republican candidates, only Mike Huckabee – who reported $5.04 million this quarter – discloses his fundraising total online. However, Dr. Paul’s total is over $9 million more than any Republican candidate raised in the third quarter.

US Government: I’m Watching You

As of this evening, I’ve started using GovTrack.us to monitor the actions of my representatives (Senators Bob Corker and Lamar Alexander and Congressman Zach Wamp), as well as any bills that I discover that happen to interest me. Thus far, I’ve only added a few recent interesting bills introduced by Ron Paul, but my goal is to add others as well as they show up in the news.

May it never be said of me that I sat idly and paid no attention to what was going on up in DC!

To see what I’m tracking at any given time, click on the “US Government In Action” tab in the header menu.

One of the more interesting things I came across while browsing bills introduced by Ron Paul was HR 3835: “To restore the Constitution’s checks and balances and protections against government abuses as envisioned by the Founding Fathers.”

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the `American Freedom Agenda Act of 2007′.

That’s good to know, because I’d never be able to remember the official name.

This bill addresses a wide range of subjects:

  1. Military Commission, Enemy Combatants, and Habeas Corpus
  2. Torture or Coerced Confessions
  3. Intelligence Gathering
  4. Presidential Signing Statements
  5. Kidnapping, Detentions, and Torture Abroad
  6. A Journalist Exception to Espionage Act
  7. Use Of Secret Evidence To Make Foreign Terrorist Designations

All in all, it’s chock-full of good stuff. Now to see if it ever makes it out of any of the committees it’s been referred to …

Further Clarification on the Ron Paul/FOX Forum Mess [UPDATED]

Fergus Cullen, Chairman of the New Hampshire GOP has released a statement on the matter:

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Date: December 31, 2007

From: Fergus Cullen, Chairman, New Hampshire Republican Party

NH REPUBLICANS: DON’T LIMIT DEBATE PARTICIPANTS

CONCORD – New Hampshire Republican Party Chairman Fergus Cullen releases the following statement regarding primary weekend debates:

“Limiting the number of candidates who are invited to participate in debates is not consistent with the tradition of the first in the nation primary. The level playing field requires that all serious candidates be given an equal opportunity to participate – not just a select few determined by the media prior to any votes being cast.”

“Therefore, the New Hampshire Republican Party calls upon all media organizations planning pre-primary debates or forums for both parties to include all recognized major candidates in their events.”

“The New Hampshire Republican Party has notified FOX News of our position, and we are in ongoing discussions with FOX News about having as many candidates as possible participate in the forum scheduled for January 6.”

Fergus Cullen
Chairman, New Hampshire Republican Party

I wish they’d make up their mind and call it either a forum or a debate, instead of switching terminology …

Hat Tip: The Daily Paul

Note: Since I initially posted this, I’ve posted the following additional articles about the FOX News exclusion, as well as the ABC News/WMUR exclusions:

More Debate Exclusion in New Hampshire
New Hampshire Debate Exclusion Update & My Open Letter to WMUR and ABC News
Senator John Sununu (R-NH) Weighs in on FOX Forum/ABC Debate Exclusions