Archive for the 'News - United States' Category

The Flap Over Charlie Birger’s Noose

A bit earlier, I encountered an article about a disagreement over who owns the noose used to hang Prohibition-era gangster Charlie Birger. The article itself is quite interesting. It includes the following interesting anecdotes:
On April 19, 1928, more than 5,000 spectators packed the jail courtyard to see Birger die. Children skipped school to watch him walk to the gallows and up the steps to the trap door, where he shook hands with executioner Phil Hanna.

“They’ve accused me of a lot of things I was never guilty of, but I was guilty of a lot of things of which they never accused me,” media accounts quoted the former cowhand and Army veteran as saying. “So I guess we’re about even.”

Before his head was covered by a black hood - he declined a white one, saying he didn’t want to be confused with the Ku Klux Klan - Birger grinned and said, “It’s a beautiful world.”

So went a colorful character.
and
Across the hall [inside the museum] is the cell where he watched the gallows being built and, according to Rea, barked out to kids he saw climbing it: “Get off of it, that’s mine.”
But … even more interesting is something I discovered when I visited Wikipedia to find more information about Birger … since I hadn’t previously heard of him. Check this out:
Charlie Birger and the rival Shelton Brothers Gang fought for control of the coal fields of Southern Illinois, but their attention was soon diverted by a common enemy. In the 1920s the Ku Klux Klan supported prohibition. Alcohol was viewed as an “unamerican” vice practiced by immigrants, many of whom belonged to the Catholic Church and other religions. Many immigrants worked the coal mines of Southern Illinois, living mainly in very small towns with a strong ethnic identity. Alcohol was a part of their life, and bootlegging came naturally to them.

In the spring of 1923, the Klan began organizing in Williamson County, holding meetings attended by more than 5000 people. The Klan drew its support from both the farming community and people in the larger towns, the latter being mainly of southern origin and followed the Baptist and other traditional protestant faiths.

The Klan soon found a charismatic leader in S. Glenn Young, who was a former federal law enforcement officer. Large mobs began going door to door searching houses for alcohol. If alcohol was found, the occupants were taken to Klan prisons. Federal authorities had apparently deputized the Klan to aid in the enforcement of Prohibition.
The Feds (probably) deputized the Klan to enforce Prohibition? Now that is something I didn’t hear about in US History (high school or college) when we studied Prohibition or talked about the Klan.

Of course … I didn’t hear much about the real origins of the Klan in high school. It wasn’t until I was in college that I discovered that the Klan was originally more of an anti-Reconstruction organization. Of course, things didn’t stay that way for long …

Technorati Tags: , ,

109th Congress Did SOMETHING

From a short article on CNN:
Despite criticism for adjourning last week without acting on several major legislative initiatives, members of Congress can boast significant achievements in at least one area of federal lawmaking — naming post offices.
Because, hey … naming buildings is important!

I always said that if somebody named a dinky highway overpass or something like that for me after I died, I would haunt those responsible (though I might accept having my name put on a cool truss bridge). “The Jeremy T. Clifton Memorial Interchange”. Ugh.

Read More: 109th Congress a success at naming buildings (the article is somewhere on that page)

Technorati Tags: ,

“Sometimes You Just Gotta Break the Rules”

Some of you may remember back in the eighties (I think) when Burger King used “Sometimes you just gotta break the rules” as one of their slogans. An alert reader (thanks, Kate!) sent me information about a couple of nut jobs in Boise who did just that, and took the Zambonis from the ice rink where they were working and went through the local Burger King’s drive through for a Whopper and onion rings. Said BK was a little over half a mile away. The Zamboni in question developed a top speed of five miles per hour.

Amazingly enough, even though they lost their job, they weren’t terribly concerned. Perhaps once whatever drugs they were using wore off, they realized that not only would walking to the BK been faster (and healthier) … it wouldn’t have cost them their job. One can only hope …

Read More: Zamboni Joy Riders Fired

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Anti-Smoking Advocates Show Their True Colors

Pop quiz! What’s the phrase you always hear when anti-smoking advocates talk about banning smoking in public places? That’s right … “second-hand smoke.” And … they’ve got a point. Almost everybody finds cigarette smoke to be obnoxious. Most people don’t like cigar smoke. And, even though lots of people have fond memories of their grandfather smoking a pipe, and love the smell … you’ll find people that don’t like that either (especially if the smoker in question is smoking something heavy on perique or latakia).

“What if I want to enjoy a steak and a glass of wine without breathing smoke?” we hear. “What if I want to go to the bar and have a beer and not come home smelling like stale cigarette smoke?” My answer has always been “Well, don’t go the restaurant/bar that allows smoking. Vote with your wallet. If enough people do that, most of the places that allow smoking will go out of business. My opinion is … if smokers want a restaurant where they can smoke, fine. If I want to eat in a restaurant without smoke … fine. We can get along here. (Note: I am an occasional pipe and cigar smoker)

Silly Libertarian ideas …

So, what happens when a city like Chicago bans smoking nearly city-wide (with the exception of shops that sell tobacco products)? What happens when, after the ban passes, when anti-smoking advocates find a place that doesn’t quite look like a tobacconist where people are smoking, poking at their laptops, and generally having fun?

Yes, that’s right, they are outraged!

Why? Is there some reason they want to visit and chill out at the Marshall McGearty Tobacco Lounge? The place that generally sells tobacco, but happens to have coffee as well, and free wireless internet access? Probably not. I’d wager there is a coffee shop around the corner they can enjoy. After all, it’s Chicago. So … obviously, second-hand smoke isn’t the issue here.

Fortunately, the article I read on the WRAL web site isn’t shy about saying why:
Critics say the lounge does something else: Sidestep an ordinance enacted to save lives.

“People are dying,” said Ed Smith, the city alderman who sponsored the ordinance. “This (business) gives them a chance to die.”

What’s more, anti-smoking advocates worry the lounge sends a dangerous message.

“These places are an effort to glamorize smoking,” said Matt Myers, president of the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, saying the lounge is an effort to create “the exact kind of attractive place young people go to.”
So … it’s really not about the second-hand smoke. It’s about saving lives … and not the lives of the non-smokers. It’s about trying to snuff out smoking completely, and helping the smokers do the right thing by making it impossible to do what they are too stupid to do on their own. Yes, some anti-smoking advocates have been saying this for years. But generally, they’ve been working the press under waving the “second-hand smoke” flag. Because really … what non-smoker likes to come home smelling like cigarette smoke? How many of them really like that smell? None. So … who among them is going to be opposed to banning public smoking? They don’t smoke, so they don’t care.

Make no mistake …. as Ed Smith and Matt Meyers demonstrate above, the real issue is whether ANYBODY should be able to choose to smoke. Yes, smoking is dirty. Yes, it has negative effects on your health. Different types of tobacco use can seriously increase your risk of certain kinds of cancer, heart and lung disease, etc. But … the key issue is … should the government really be able to say whether you should be able to do something that is detrimental to your health? Do you REALLY want them making that choice?

Try changing a few words in the quotes above:
“These places are an effort to glamorize fast food,” said Matt Myers, president of the Campaign for Fast Food-Free Kids, saying the lounge is an effort to create “the exact kind of attractive place young people go to.”
Hmmm. Yes, fast food isn’t generally healthy either. Nobody wants to see kids eating three meals a day at McDonald’s either. We’ve got far too many people in this nation with an obesity problem (myself included). But, the fact is, most of us have at least one unhealthy habit. Do we want the government banning [insert your bugagboo here]? No! It’s not their responsibility to keep you healthy.

So, what’s the big deal about this place in Chicago … one among millions of businesses … where people can go and smoke and chill? There isn’t any big deal. Let them smoke. They aren’t forcing you, Mr. or Mrs. anti-smoking advocate, to breathe their second-hand smoke. You have your businesses … and now that is most of Chicago. Let them have theirs.

Read More: A Year After City Smoking Ban, Tobacco Lounge Still In Business

Cardinals Win World Series!

Yeah, it’s not news any more. But I’m happy! It’s the first time in my life that the team I was pulling for won the World Series! Yay!

Trespassers Win $24.2 Million

Sorry for the lack of updates. It’s been a busy week. My grandfather is in the hospital. A friend’s mother died on Wednesday. Another friend has a three-year-old granddaughter in the hospital with a serious heart condition that will require surgery. Rachel had a friend come and visit on Wednesday; today she saw two other college friends, and my old friend Brian and his wife Chris came to town for the weekend. So … a week of ups and downs.

I do have a couple of short posts in the works … maybe I will finish them tomorrow. I may be able to post some pictures, if I can convince my camera to allow me to download them from the internal memory.

Now, on to the juicy stuff … I just read this on MSNBC:
PHILADELPHIA - A federal jury awarded $24.2 million to two men who were severely burned by electrical wires when they trespassed onto railroad property and climbed atop a rail car. Jeffrey Klein and Brett Birdwell, who were 17 at the time of the accident, sued Amtrak and Norfolk Southern Corp. after being burned by a 12,500-volt electrical wire in Lancaster in August 2002. In their lawsuit, they argued that the companies should have placed warning signs alerting people to the wires, which power locomotives.
So, lemme get this straight … an easy ticket to being a millionaire:

1. Trespass.
2. Get Hurt.
3. Sue.

In one sense, I’m amazed. On the other hand … in a world where a grandmother sues people who joke about her fruitcake and a woman (successfully) sues McDonald’s when she is burned by hot coffee … I shouldn’t be surprised.

I suppose the fact that the railroads had “no trespassing” signs (at least I’m assuming they did … whenever I’ve been around railroad property, there were “no trespassing” signs all over the place) wasn’t good enough. And why would they have such signs up, and a “no trespassing” policy? Ummm … maybe because the property was dangerous? Hmmmm.

Wow.

Read More: $24.2 million for men burned atop rail car

Houston murders are through the roof this year

In the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, one of the first cities to respond and offer housing to displaced residents was Houston, TX. Many of the nearly 250,000 evacuees (150,000 still remain) have thanked Houston by helping bring the total number of homicides this year to the highest in over a decade.
At least 65 slayings in 2006 have been classified as Katrina-related, meaning either the victim, suspect or both evacuated to Houston after Katrina. Police have not kept records of how evacuees have affected crime rates other than homicide. The murder rate began to rise at the end of last year, when the city recorded 334 homicides. During the previous 10 years, Houston never exceeded the 316 slayings counted in 1995.
They’ve still got a long way to go to match 1981, when there were 701 killings. Still, it’s sad.

Read More: Houston homicides spike; evacuees cited 

School Bans Tag

First it was dodgeball, now it’s tag. WRAL is reporting that Willett Elementary School in Attleboro, MA has banned tag and other “chasing” games during recess. The principle says there is too much risk of injury and lawsuits resulting from injuries.

An over-reaction? Maybe so. I played tag, dodgeball, and all sorts of other games that could have gotten me injured as a kid. Matter of fact, I probably got a good number of bruises. But I seem to have come out OK.

On the other hand, we live in a litigious society. It’s a shame when that sort of thing brings an end to childhood fun, though.

Read more: Elementary School Bans Tag During Recess

Covering the Amish Tragedy

Today, at least for a bit, I’m going to take a short break from the usual harping on stupidity in politics and in the news in general. I ran into a genuinely fascinating Newsweek article posted on MSNBC about how the media covered the Amish massacre a few weeks ago.

Personally, I was thought that many times the news media crossed the line in their coverage. Several days in a row I saw photos on the front page of web sites (or the paper) depicting members of the Amish community, and they were clearly recognizeable … and even I knew that the Amish don’t want to be photographed.

The Newsweek article delves into some of the decision-making that went on concerning how to cover the event and its aftermath, and it shows that deciding where to draw the line is not the easiest decision to make. Obviously, there is a tension between respecting the desires of a very private, secluded community for continued privacy, especially in a emotional situation like the massacre, and bringing the story to a nation hungry for news.

Consider this quote:

Paul Carpenter, a columnist at the Morning Call in Allentown, Pa., published a piece about the debate he had with his editor, Ardith Hilliard, over whether to print photographs with recognizable Amish faces. Hilliard argued that it was necessary to publish the upclose images it used because they were part of a breaking news story. “These were very gentle people who … are pacifists by belief and had imposed upon them this unspeakable horror,” Hilliard says. “In the process of storytelling, I would’ve found it extremely difficult to tell that story without in some way depicting the human beings that were affected.” Carpenter thought the paper should not have run the photos. “The mainline news media … has contempt for paparazzi and the tabloid approach to journalism,” he says. “But when you think about it, the paparazzi targets celebrities who have sought the spotlight. So which is more intrusive—that, or what we did to the Amish?”

I still wouldn’t have personally published the photos of the faces of Amish men and women, had I been editor.

Fortunately for the news media (and for those of us whose hunger for news drives them), the Amish seem just as willing to forgive those who transgressed against them and bothered them during the few days the tragedy was in the national spotlight. There are some things, it seems, that we all could learn from the Amish. Perhaps they hope that we might learn something, most importantly the value of forgiveness and not holding grudges, from them as a result of the news coverage. I certainly hope we do.

Read more: Amish Massacre Missteps?

Ken Lay no longer guilty because he’s dead …

So, while browsing MSNBC today, I stumbled upon this surprising bit of information: “Judge throws out convictions of Enron’s Lay: Fraud ruling vacated since company’s founder died before he could appeal.”

Huh? Say again?

Yes, that’s right boys and girls, since he appealed, and then died, his conviction has been vacated. Erased. Gone. Kaput.
U.S. District Judge Sim Lake, in a ruling Tuesday, agreed with Lay’s lawyers that his death required that his conviction be erased and his indictment dismissed. They cited a 2004 ruling from the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that found that a defendant’s death pending appeal extinguished his entire case because he hadn’t had a full opportunity to challenge the conviction and the government shouldn’t be able to punish a dead defendant or his estate.
I’m not sure what’s more surprising … that a judge would “un-convict” Lay for such an asinine reason, or the fact that there’s precedent for such a ruling because some brain-dead nitwit ruled in a similar matter two years ago. And that’s not all … check this out:
Prosecutors offered no counter legal argument in the case, but asked Lake to hold off on a ruling until next week so Congress could consider legislation from the Justice Department that changes current federal law regarding the abatement of criminal convictions. Congress recessed for the elections without considering the legislation. In their motion to Lake last month, prosecutors Sean Berkowitz and John Hueston wrote that certain provisions of the proposed legislation would apply to Lay’s case, including “that the death of a defendant charged with a criminal offense shall not be the basis for abating or otherwise invalidating either a verdict returned or the underlying indictment.”
Yes, that’s right … Congress was going to consider legislation that would have prevented the sort of ruling issued today, but somehow that legislation would have then been applied to something that happened before the legislation was even considered. Completely mind-boggling. Saith the US Constitution in Article I, Section 9:
No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed.
If the Latin there is causing smoke to boil out of your ears, here’s a bit more explanation from Wikipedia:
An ex post facto law (from the Latin for “from something done afterward”) or retroactive law, is a law that retroactively changes the legal consequences of acts committed or the legal status of facts and relationships that existed prior to the enactment of the law.
Sounds an awful lot like what the prosecution wanted was a violation of the spirit of that principle, if not the letter. Of course, how many of you out there are surprised any more when the US Government ignores the intent of the Constitution? It’s been happening for a good 170 years or more now, so we’re all used to it.

What an all-around mess …

Read more: Judge throws out convictions of Enron’s LayÂ